Information About Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

By Margaret Bailey


Approaches to surgical operation have changed and evolved widely as a result of technological advancements. The abbreviation SILS is often used for single incision laparoscopic surgery, which is also referred to by man other names. Those other names include single-port access surgery (SPA), Single-port laparoscopy (SPL), and natural-orifice trannsumbilical surgery. Other terms used are one-port umbilical surgery (OPUS), single-port incision-less conventional equipment-using surgery, laparro-endoscopic singular-site surgery (LESS), and single-access endoscopic surgery (SAES).

SILS as a technique under laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new idea with a rather short history. It falls under minimally invasive techniques of surgical operations because of its use of one incision point. In many patients, the navel serves as the entry point. Small scars are formed from the process. The small size of the scar is among the reasons for high preference of the method by patients and surgeons.

The entry point can be made into a 20 mm or 11mm incision. The importance of utilizing only a single entry point is to minimize pain and scarring. This is opposed to traditional laparoscopic surgical procedure in which multiple entry point are made and used. New York is home to some of the most well-trained and qualified specialists in this kind of procedure. Thus it would be a great place to consider visiting if one needs such a process done to them.

The process makes use of specialized surgical equipment that can be classified into two major classes, that is hand and access ports instruments. There is a wide variety of access ports instruments including the GelPOINT system, SILS device, TriPort+, QuadPort+, TriPort15, and Uni-X. All these instruments are manufactured by different manufacturers.

On the contrary, hand instruments are made in three main configurations, that is, articulating, standard, and pre-bent rigid. Standard hand tools have been developed over a period of the last thirty years. Their design is rigid. Articulation hand instruments were made to solve problems in SPL reduced triangulation instrument.

A choice always has to be made between standard and articulating instruments by surgeons. Certain factors play a role in influencing that decision. Among those factors are cost, access port utilized, the level of training and skills commanded by the surgeon. It costs much more to use articulating instruments compared to using standard ones. However, the use of specialized tools promotes safety and efficiency.

There is a high level of awareness of SILS among surgical doctors currently. However, it cannot be performed by any surgeon. The process is very complicated since it involves using specialized instruments through limited access space. Thus, surgical doctors who perform this process are often highly skilled and trained in surgical operation. That has made the use of this process limited and negative perceptions have followed from the public too.

SILS has been used on a wide variety of surgical procedures. Some major examples include colectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, adjustable gastric banding, sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, appendectomy, and nephrectomy among several others. Among European countries and the United States, standard instruments are being used more commonly compared to specialized instruments.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment